Showing posts with label Mythological Stories. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mythological Stories. Show all posts

Saturday, August 18, 2012

Sri Krishna - 16,000 wives yet a Brahmachari: Part 2. Nitya Brahmachari and Nitya Upavasi

We received three comments in the last seven days: two comments for the blog, ‘Sri Krishna – 16,000 wives, yet a brahmachari’ and one comment for the blog, ‘Message from the Gospel – 19. Solitude Is Necessary’. All these comments are highly valuable as they provide new insights regarding those topics and also help us learn important lessons.

The comments received for the blog, ‘Sri Krishna – 16,000 wives, yet a brahmachari’ provided a link:


This made us aware of a site celextel.org. We visited this site and read the story mentioned in the link above. The wealth of knowledge available at celextel is simply remarkable.

Whereas our blog provided only the information about Sri Krishna’s brahmacharya, the story at celextel explains what makes Sri Krishna a nitya brahmachari. Here is the story in short:

One day, Krishna informs his wife Rukmani that Sage Durvasa is camping on the other side of the river Yamuna and tells her, “Prepare a sumptuous meal and take it to the sage and feed him. He will be pleased and will bless you.” Rukmani prepares the food but when she goes to the river, she was not able to find any boatman to take her across the river. So, she seeks the help of Krishna. He tells her, “Say to the river that the Nitya brahmachari has asked her to part and let you cross.” Rukmani was surprised but still she says what she was asked to say and the river indeed parts and lets her cross it. Rukmani goes to the sage, feeds him, and the sage was indeed pleased and he blesses her. When she has to leave, she tells him, “Please help me cross the river.” Sage Durvasa says, “Tell the river that the Nitya Upavasi [one who has never eaten food] has asked her to part and let you cross.” Again Rukmani is surprised and thinks, “Just now he had a sumptuous meal, yet he calls himself Nitya Upavasi?”  Still, she doesn’t ask him anything and follows his instruction. The river indeed parts when she tells that the Nitya Upavasi had asked her to part. Rukmani reaches the other side and unable to control her curiosity, asks Krishna, “You called yourself Nitya Brahmachari and the sage called himself Nitya Upavasi after eating the food I offered him. And the river agreed to both and parted. I am not able to understand.” Krishna laughs and tells her, “We are both realized souls. When we perform an action we understand that it is the body which is performing the action. The soul is unattached. That soul does not marry and does not take food.”

That is how Sri Krishna (his soul) is a brahmachari and Sage Durvasa (his soul) is a upavasi. Once we understand this great truth, we can lead a contended and happy life.

Is it possible to remain unattached? When we accomplish something and people praise us, do we have the humility to believe that we are not the doer? When problems confront us and we receive blows left and right, is it possible for us not to blame the Almighty for the misfortune? When we develop the equanimity of mind – to remain unperturbed in success and failure – we may think that we are getting closer to the ideal.

Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Sri Krishna –- 16,000 wives, yet a brahmachari

A couple of days ago, I was browsing the internet, searching for the spelling of ‘Bhagavatam’, when the following information caught my attention: according to Srimad Bhagavatam, Lord Sri Krishna ruled over the kingdom of Dwarka and he had 16,000 wives and expanded himself 16,000 times to live as an example of a perfect householder.

We look upon Gods as role models, who led their life in such a way as to set examples for ordinary humans. I am a Hindu and, naturally, whenever people confronted me with the question, “What kind of God is your God who had so many wives?”, I used to feel unhappy. I used to wonder within me whether such a thing can ever be justified.

A few days ago, I got the answer. Lord Sri Krishna might have had 16,000 wives, but he was an Akanda Brahmachari. This He declares in the battlefield of Kurukshetra.

People highlight the statement in Srimad Bhagavatam but they ignore (or hide) Sri Krishna’s own statement. When Dronacharya’s son Ashwatthaama releases an arrow from his bow with a curse that it should kill all the Pandava children, Lord Sri Krishna vows to save the unborn child in Uthara’s (Abhimanyu’s wife) womb. Sri Krishna declares, “If there is any truth in the fact that I am an Akanda Brahmachari, may Uthara’s child be saved from the wrath of Ashwatthaama.”

The child was indeed saved, who grew up to become King Parikshit.  

This was conveyed in a talk rendered by Swami Purushothamananda, many years ago. I was fortunate enough to hear the recorded version of the talk recently.

Now that I know the truth, I don’t have any more doubts about the divinity or purity of Lord Sri Krishna. I also understood how little I know about Hindu Gods.

Only a man (I mean God) of such great purity could have given the immortal song celestial Bhagavad Gita. All power is in preserving one’s purity.  

More on this purity aspect in my next blog…

P.S. If you found this blog interesting, you may read Part 2 and Part 3 of this blog:

Sri Krishna –- 16,000 wives, yet a brahmachari: Part 2.

Sri Krishna –- 16,000 wives, yet a brahmachari: Part 3.


  

Monday, June 21, 2010

Valmiki

Valmiki, in his early life, was an unnamed highway robber. Once, the robber tried to rob the divine sage Narada for the benefit of his family. Narada asked him if his family would share the sin he was incurring due to the robbery. The robber replied positively, but Narada told him to confirm this with his family. The robber asked his family, but none agreed to bear the burden of sin. Dejected, the robber finally understood the truth of life and asked for Narada's forgiveness. Narada taught the robber to worship God. Narada gave him the mantra “Rama” and asked him to meditate on this mantra. Valmiki was not able to repeat the word “Rama.” He uttered it as “Mara.” Sage Narada asked him to continue reciting it as “Mara” itself. When uttered continuously, Mara Mara Mara…, it becomes Rama Rama Rama. The robber meditated for many years, so much so that ant-hills grew around his body. Finally, a divine voice declared his penance successful, bestowing him with the name "Valmiki": "one born out of ant-hills".

That is the power of Japa and Meditation. Through sincere devotion to God and faith in his Guru (Narada), a highway robber who used to kill people indiscriminately and rob their wealth, became a great saint Valmiki and composed the epic Ramayana, the story of Ram and Sita.

Sunday, June 13, 2010

Jadabharata

The story of Jadabharata is a story from Indian Mythology with deep insights into Indian Philosophy of the reality of the self. The story appears in the Vishnu Purana and Bhagavata Purana.

Bharata was born in the Solar Dynasty, in the line of Manu Svayambhuva, the eldest of a hundred sons of a saintly king by the name of Rishabha Deva, who ruled over the earth. When Rishabha Deva became old he entrusted the rule of his kingdom to Bharata and retired to the forest to perform tapas.

Read complete article: Jadabharata

Thursday, June 10, 2010

Suka

Śuka, also known as Suka Deva, was the son of the sage Vyasa (author of the Vedas and Puranas) and was the main narrator of the Bhagavata Purana. Most of the Bhagavata Purana consists of Śuka reciting the story to the dying king Parikshit. Śuka is depicted as a sannyasi, renouncing the world in pursuit of moksha (liberation), which most narratives state that he achieved.


According to the Mahabharata, after one hundred years of austerity by Vyasa, Śuka was churned out of a stick of fire, born with ascetic power and with the Vedas dwelling inside him, just like his father.

As a child, he used to spend all of his time meditating in the forest near his father’s ashram. By inquiring into the ways of the world, he was awakened to truth in his heart. By inquiring himself with his own intelligent mind, he obtained the eternal truths. In spite of gaining such knowledge about truth, his mind remained restless. He could not develop faith in his finding `that this is the truth'.

One day while he was meditating, a desire arose in his mind to go to Vaikuntha to see Lord Vishnu. However, when he reached there the gatekeepers informed Lord Vishnu who declined to met him. The gatekeepers came and told him, “We are very sorry, but you have no Guru and those without a Guru can never enter here.” Suka returned to his father and told him what had happened. He was a bit vain and proud, thinking that he was the son of a great rishi, that he had already done so many years of tapas, and so there was no need of a Guru. However, as Lord Vishnu Himself had said that a Guru was necessary, Suka sought his father’s advice as to who he should select as his Guru.

He asked his father, Krishnadvaipayana (Vyasa) – who was residing in solitude on a peak of Meru – thus: “O sage, how did this vain display of `samsara' arise? Where is it going? When will it subside?” Having been questioned thus, by his son, the great Vyasa who knows the Self, gave appropriate reply. However, Suka could not give respectful attention to his father's words thinking that he knew all that already. Bhagwan Vyasa understood the conceited opinion of his son and told him: “There is only one Guru for you and that is King Janaka of Videha. I do not know more than this. The great king Janaka knows everything about Self. Please learn from him all that is to be known.”

“Father, have you lost your mind? What is there in common between a king and a sannyasi? How can I take him as my Guru?” asked Suka.

“There is nobody else who could be your Guru,” replied the sage.

Twelve times the sage sent the boy to King Janaka and twelve times he returned even before reaching there due to his doubts and misgivings.

Once he even reached the palace, but on seeing the richness of the palace and the great assemblage of worldly people, he thought that the king must be one who is given up to sensual pleasure, and so he was not prepared to accept him as his Master. The more doubts and suspicions one has about a Realized Soul, the more one harms oneself.

Suspecting or slandering a Mahatma destroys one’s merits (punyam). When Suka was being sent back to the king for the thirteenth time, the sage Narada took pity on him. He disguised himself as an old brahmin and was carrying a basket of earth on his head. As he approached a small river that was flowing nearby, he would throw the earth into it and it would get washed away. Seeing this, Suka accosted him and said, “Look here, old man. First put some sticks across the stream and then some large lumps of earth on them and then only throw the earth on that. Otherwise it will be only fruitless labour if you are trying to build a dam across the river the way you are doing it.”

“I am only losing my day’s effort,” said Narada, “but there is a young man who is a bigger fool than I am, and he is Suka Deva, the son of Vedavyasa. For he has already lost 12 of the 14 merits that he possessed. He has only two left.” When Suka heard this, he fell down in a faint. When he regained consciousness, he was all alone, but he remembered the words of the old man and rushed to the king’s palace.

Still having some pride that he was the son of Vedavyasa, he thought that the king would come and meet him on the way. But no one came to meet him. When the king was informed of his arrival, he gave the orders, “Let him stand right where he is.” Suka just happened to be standing on the spot where the palace garbage was thrown over the wall, and as a result, it was not long before he was buried under the refuse.

Four days passed in this way when the king enquired, “What happened to Suka who had come to see me?” “He has been standing in the same spot, Maharaj,” replied the servant.” Let him be extricated from the heap of rubbish, bathed, dressed and brought here,” ordered the king.

When Suka was brought to his presence as told, Janaka said to Sukadeva, "Give me my dakshina before I teach you anything, because after you learn this teaching, you will reject everything, including me (the Guru)." The Guru Janaka was already a Videha (one who had renounced all attachment to the body. Suka, after getting the brahma jnana would also become a videha (losing sense of his body). When both the Guru and disciple lose their sense of their body, it will neither be possible for the disciple to give dakshina to the Guru nor for the Guru to receive it. Hence Janaka asked Suka to give Gurudakshina before revealing the brahma jnana. No teaching is beneficial to the student unless the Gurudakshina is given, and hence the emphasis by Janaka for Gurudakshina.

King Janaka’s test of Suka

King Janaka, knowing that Suka was proud of his renunciation, created an illusion. Just after Suka entered the room, a servant came running in with a report that the entire town was on fire. “It’s all God’s Will,” said Janaka cooly. After a short while another report came that all of the king’s courts were reduced to ashes. “God’s Will,” said the king. Then the news came that the king’s own palace was on fire. “All God’s Will,” repeated the king. Suka was thinking what a fool the king was not to do anything about the fire. Suka grabbed his bag and started to run away to save himself from the approaching fire, but the king caught hold of his arm.

“Look,” said the king, “all of my wealth and possessions have been burnt to ashes, but I haven’t bothered about them. Now that the fire has reached the palace, you have taken hold of this small bundle of your possessions with the intention of saving them. After all, what are your things worth? Now, who exactly is the greater renunciate – you or I?”

Next, the king ordered that a great festival be held in honour of Suka’s visit to the city. Festivities, dances, plays and various stalls were set up. All was to entertain Suka. When everything was ready, the king asked Suka to go through the city and enjoy everything, “But,” said the king, “please carry this full cup of milk with you wherever you go.” He then bade the soldiers who were to accompany Suka, “Take Suka through every part of the city. Let him see everything and miss nothing. But if he should spill a single drop of milk from this cup, my orders are that you should behead him on the spot.”

Suka went out with the soldiers and came back in the evening. “I am sure that you had a nice time? How did you enjoy everything?”

“O king, as it turned out, I saw nothing, for at every moment all of my thoughts were concentrated on this cup, lest I should spill a drop and lose my life,” said Suka.

“Suka, that is how I live in the midst of all this luxury and grandeur. I see nothing. For at every moment my thoughts are centered on the Lord lest I too should lose my life,” said the king.

“Imagine that the cup is death, the milk is your mind, and the festivities are the ephemeral pleasures and splendors of the world. I pass through this world with great caution, so that the milk of the mind is not spilled, or agitated, and all attention is concentrated every moment on God. For even a moment spent in not thinking of Him would be death to me.”

The king could now see that Suka’s mind was cleansed of pride and was ready, so he initiated him. When Śuka asked Janaka about the way to liberation, Janaka recommended the traditional progression of the four stages recommended for human life (Brahmacharya, Grihasta, Vanaprasta and Sanyasa), which included the householder stage (Grihasta). After expressing contempt for the householder life, Śuka questioned Janaka about the real need for following the householder path. Seeing Śuka's advanced state of realization, Janaka told him that there was no need for the householder stage in his case.

King Janaka asked Suka : ` You have done everything that is to be done in this world. You have obtained whatever you wanted. What do you want now?'

Suka: ` O Guru, How did this vain display of samsara arise? How will this subside? Please tell me everything?

Asked thus by Suka, Janaka gave the same reply as given earlier by Vyasa.

Suka: My father also gave me the same reply. I have known this myself earlier through my intelligent inquiries. O best of the knowers of the word, these are elaborated in the same way in the scriptures. All this is self-deception. It will vanish when this self-deception vanishes. This wasteful world is sapless (and uninteresting). This is evidently true. `But why is it so.? O mighty king, please tell me the firm truth. Let my wandering, unstable mind gain repose'.

Janaka: “O sage, there is nothing else other than what you yourself have understood and what your father told you.” “There is no other existence other than that undifferentiated consciousness – Self. He is bound by self-will. He is unbound without that will.” “With your disinterest in pleasures of this phenomenal world, you have very clearly known all that is to be known by great souls.” “Even at a very young age you have become a great conqueror of sickening pleasures. What else do you want to know or hear?' `Even your father, the great storehouse of all knowledge and an embodiment of `tapas', has not attained the fullness and perfection as you have.” “I am greater than Vyasa. You are his son and disciple. Having conquered the desire for pleasure, you have exceeded me even.” You have gained whatever is to be gained, you have become one with perfect mind. O knower of Brahman, you will never slip into this phenomenal world. You are liberated. Throw away the illusion.” Having been declared thus, by the great Janaka, Suka fell silent and rose to abide in the supreme state. Having dispelled of all doubts, desires and being free from fear and sorrow, Suka went to meru peak to sit in samadhi. There he remained in nirvikalpa samadhi for ten thousand years and attained nirvana like a lamp without oil. Sukadeva attained oneness with Brahman, having become completely pure devoid of all deformations, fancies and imaginations. He was totally free from all vasanas. His unity was like a waterdrop merging in the ocean waters.

Stories recount how Śuka surpassed his father in spiritual attainment. Once, when following his son, Vyasa encountered a group of celestial nymphs who were bathing. Śuka's purity was such that the nymphs did not consider him to be a distraction, even though he was naked, but covered themselves when faced with his father. Śuka is sometimes portrayed as wandering about naked, due to his complete lack of self-consciousness.

However, Devi-Bhagavata gives an entirely alternate version of the later life of Śuka. In this account, Śuka is convinced by Janaka to follow the ashrama tradition, and returns home to marry and follow the path of yoga. He had five children from his wife Pivari – four sons and a daughter. The story concludes in the same vein as the more common tradition, with Śuka achieving moksha.

Source: 1. Wikipedia; 2. Sri Yoga Vasishtam